Pulse oximeters are generally accurate within a range of 2% to 4% of the actual oxygen saturation levels in healthy individuals. This means if a pulse oximeter reads 95%, the true oxygen saturation could be between 91% and 99%. However, their accuracy can be affected by several factors.
Skin pigmentation can influence readings, with studies indicating that pulse oximeters may overestimate oxygen saturation in individuals with darker skin tones. This discrepancy arises because the devices use light absorption to measure oxygen levels, and melanin can affect light absorption.
Poor circulation, cold extremities, or movement can also impact accuracy. In cases of low perfusion, such as in patients with hypotension or hypothermia, the device may not provide reliable readings. Motion artifacts, such as those caused by shivering or movement, can lead to erroneous results.
Nail polish, particularly dark colors, and artificial nails can interfere with the light sensor, leading to inaccurate readings. Additionally, external light sources, like bright sunlight or surgical lights, can affect the device's performance.
In clinical settings, pulse oximeters are less reliable in patients with carbon monoxide poisoning or methemoglobinemia, as these conditions can falsely elevate oxygen saturation readings.
Despite these limitations, pulse oximeters are valuable tools for non-invasive monitoring of oxygen saturation, especially in settings like hospitals, clinics, and home care. For critical decisions, however, arterial blood gas analysis remains the gold standard for measuring oxygen levels. Regular calibration and proper usage can help mitigate some of the inaccuracies associated with pulse oximeters.